Here is a thought…
Wouldn’t the Haynes v. United States SCOTUS ruling be a loophole for any gun registration of any kind – “Assault Weapon” or other wise???
Haynes v. United States, 390 U.S.85 (1968), was a United States Supreme Court decision interpreting the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution’s self-incrimination clause.
So, since any gun registration law that is passed makes legal gun owners into instant criminals, then wouldn’t complying with said registration be a form of self-incrimination? Certainly this whole amnesty crap that they are trying to do after the fact in Connecticut would fall along those lines, right? If you didn’t comply with the registration and then go forward under “amnesty” (which isn’t even the law) then you would technically be self-incriminating.
Talk amongst yourselves.
*I am not a lawyer. This is not legal advise.